Lets face it Jay everything they do is ok with you. I remember all the excuses you made for them shafting Stephen Martin. It was embarrassing. There literally has been nothing you haven't been eager to make excuses for. It wasn't me who made the comment about her chocolate shop working on this thread but long before this post a person who has extensive and ongoing dealings with HQ said he questioned if she worked full time as she was never there.
I do have an issue with a press release from a PR company BSAC uses about the new BSAC president manages to get a quick reference in about her private business. The line is crossed. This wasn't some business she had before becoming chief executive. It is one she set up and runs while being chief executive.
I think it is reasonable that an employee who is meant to be Chief Executive of an organisation and receives a very substantial salary for that role - very substantial and way over the going rate for an organisation of BSAC's size - to be fully committed to that job and not be the director of another business at the same time. It's called double jobbing. A chief executive role isn't a 9-5 sort of job.
BSAC is an organisation which is being run in to the ground. We have a chief executive who has overseen every single year of the decline.
After 29 years she has achieved nothing but constant decline. Her side kick and business partner has been there throughout the majority of the decline. In any other organisation it would be recognised that new blood needs injecting and those that have been unable to stop the decline need to go.
But in BSAC we look the other way because we are unable to manage our employees.
ATEOTD you have got your knives out for everyone on Council - that is your prerogative but just because I don't see the benefit in the personal attacks that you undertake doesn't mean that I have to sit back and watch.
IMHO the case has been very clearly made for the accusation that HQ seems to care more about themselves than their membership. They're certainly a closed shop that liberally use NDAs (non disclosure agreements) to 'gag' people.
Quite frankly they're not the kind of organisation I'd want to be a member of.
It's a pity though as we need an open and dynamic national organisation to represent and lobby for our chosen sport.
As soon as someone questioned Tetley's working hours you immediately jumped in and said her business was online and she could work it outside her bsac hours. You were wrong, as you almost always are. But does that stop you? No.
The ignore list has let me down as it used to hide your nonsense. I will try re-adding you to it but will also make sure I don't read anything from you. If I wanted an incoherent conversation with someone I would talk to my five year old about why he can't really dig a hole to Australia!
Last edited by scuba; Today at 08:02 PM.
Play the ball not the man
Rememeber anything you read on the internet was probably written by some guy sitting at home in his underpants! Including this !!